Rational Decision Making

Define a decision as a logical outcome. What do you get?
You get a rational decision making system that is fast, mathematically accurate and adapts on the fly.
It learns and reasons without training, as soon as rules or conditions change, and you always know why a decision was made regardless of how arbitrarily complex it is.

Forget about the legacy probabilistic machines (modern engineers’ “AI”), because this one is deterministic. You cannot have it better for life- or mission-critical decisions.

Meister Eckhart’s Sermons

The following are quotes from Meister Eckhart’s Sermons.

1. We may perhaps venture to predict that the Christian biologist of the future will turn the Pauline Christology into his own dialect somewhat after the following fashion:
–“The function of religion in the human race is closely analogous to, if not identical with, that of instinct in the lower animals. Religion is the racial will to live; not, however, to live anyhow and at all costs, but to live as human beings, conforming as far as possible to the highest type of humanity. Religion, therefore, acts as a higher instinct, inhibiting all self-destroying and race-destroying impulses in the interest of a larger self than the individual life.”
To turn this statement into theological form it is only necessary to claim that the “perfect man” which the religious instinct is trying to form is “the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ,” that perfect humanity was once realised in the historical Christ, and that the higher instinct within us, which makes for life and righteousness, and is the source of all the good that we can think, say, or do, may (in virtue of that historical incarnation) be justly called the indwelling Christ.

2. We must be in absolutely constant relation or mental touch with that essence of life which permeates all and which we call God.
This is almost unrecognisable unless we live into it ourselves actually — that is, by a constant turning to the very innermost, deepest consciousness of our real selves or of God in us, for illumination from within, just as we turn to the sun for light, warmth, and invigoration without.

3. Spiritual supremacy and illumination thus realised through the development and perfection of intuition under divine inspiration gives the perfect inner vision and direct insight into the character, properties, and purpose of all things to which the attention and interest are directed. It is, we repeat, a spiritual sense opening inwardly, as the physical senses open outwardly; and because it has the capacity to perceive, grasp, and know the truth at first hand, independent of all external sources of information, we call it intuition.

4. St Augustine says: the best thing that man can say about God is to be able to be silent about Him, from the wisdom of his inner judgement. Therefore be silent and prate not about God, for whenever thou dost prate about God, thou liest, and committest sin. Thou canst understand nought about God, for He is above all understanding.

5. The masters say: That is young, which is near its beginning.

6. The man who has submitted his will and purposes entirely to God, carries God with him in all his works and in all circumstances. Therein can no man hinder him, for he neither aims at nor enjoys anything else, save God. God is united with Him in all his purposes and designs. Even as no manifoldness can dissipate God, so nothing can dissipate such a man, or destroy his unity.

7. But if the man were wise and diligent, the opposition of the devil and his exercises would be much more profitable to him than the aid of the good angel; for if there were no struggle, there could be no victory.

8. Knock also at the door through which we must go–namely, Christ Jesus.
At this door, the praying man must knock for three ends, if he wishes to be really admitted.
First he must knock devoutly, at the broken heart and the open side, and enter in with all devotion, and in recognition of his unfathomable poverty and nothingness, as poor Lazarus did at the rich man’s gate, and ask for crumbs of His grace.
Then again, he should knock at the door of the holy open wounds of His holy hands, and pray for true Divine knowledge, that it may enlighten him and exalt him.
Finally, knock at the door of His holy feet, and pray for true Divine love, which may unite thee with Him, and immerse and cover thee in Him.

9. Hence a certain doctor says: God is a circle, whose centre is everywhere, and His circumference nowhere.

10. The more simple any being is in itself, the more manifold is it in its energy and operation.

11. Reason mounts up in its own light and by its own power, till at last it comes to think itself the true eternal light, and gives itself out to be such; and it is thus deceived in itself, and deceives others at the same time, people who know no better and are prone to be so deceived.

12. The most noble and gracious gift that is bestowed on any creature is the Reason and the Will. These two are so intimately connected that the one cannot be anywhere without the other. If it were not for these two gifts, there would be no reasonable creatures, but only brutes and brutality; and this would be a great loss, for God would then never receive His due, or behold Himself and His attributes exhibited in action; a thing which ought to be, and is, necessary to perfection.
For it pertains to the will, to will something. For what else does it exist? It would be a vain thing if it had no work to do, and this it cannot have without the creature. And so there must needs be creatures, and God will have them, in order that by their means the will may be exercised, and may work, though in God it must be without work. Therefore the will in the creature, which we call the created will, is as truly God’s as the eternal will, and is not from the creature.

Systems thinking

In his treatise “Rules for the Direction of the Mind” (1701), Descartes states regarding the first of his rules, the principle of systems thinking applied to sciences.

Whenever men notice some similarity between two things, they are wont to ascribe to each, even in those respects to which the two differ, what they have found to be true of the other.
Thus they erroneously compare the sciences, which entirely exist in the cognitive exercise of the mind, with the arts, which depend upon an exercise and disposition of the body.
They see that not all the arts can be acquired by the same man, but that he who restricts himself to one, most readily becomes the best executant, since it is not so easy for the same hand to adapt itself both to agricultural operations and to harp-playing, or to the performance of several such tasks as to one alone.
Hence they have held the same to be true of the sciences also, and distinguishing them from one another according to their subject matter, they have imagined that they ought to be studied separately, each in isolation from all the rest. But this is certainly wrong. 

This was much before modern management concerned itself with the subject, and in this context Russ Ackoff provides an apt overview:

21st Century Leadership

It requires a quite different strength and agility to maintain one’s position within a system that is never fixed and where ideas are free and still evolving, than in a dogmatic world.

Nietzsche, 1885

Nietzsche (1885) was talking about Leonardo da Vinci, but his words apply justly to the PMI Disciplined Agile system, a «people-first, learning-oriented, shared and ever-adapting body of knowledge».
This system, in particular the DA Flow for Enterprise Transformation (DA FLEX), is the humane leadership approach we need to lead 21st century knowledge workers into a brighter future both for corporations and workers, breaking with decades of simplistic one-size-fits-all single-loop empirical control and people-alienating processes such as Scrum.

I have recently achieved the DA Value Stream Consultant certification, and I stand by every word that PMI uses to describe this wonderful body of knowledge. This is the way to build and lead great teams and re-energize enterprise-wide initiatives for the rest of the 21st century and beyond.

Also I would like to commend the PM Training School for their quality training and their support during the whole journey.

Leonardo da Vinci

Portrait of a man in red chalk, believed to be Leonardo’s self-portrait

The following are statements attributed to Leonardo in his written works [1]. Each paragraph is a different statement from a potentially different original source.

1. But since we know that painting embraces and contains within itself all things produced by nature or whatever results from man’s passing actions – and ultimately everything that can be taken in by the eyes (…) he seems to me to be a pitiful master who can only do one thing well.

2. The good painter has to paint two principal things, that is to say, man and the intention of his mind. The first is easy and the second difficult, because the latter has to be represented through gestures and movements of the limbs.

3. I shall not refrain from including among these precepts a new aid to contemplation, which, although seemingly trivial and almost ridiculous, is none the less of great utility in arousing the mind to various inventions. And this is, if you look at any walls soiled with a variety of stains, or stones with variegated patterns (…), you will therein be able to see a resemblance to various landscapes graced with mountains, rivers, rocks, trees, plains, great valleys and hills in many combinations. Or again you will be able to see various battles and figures darting about, strange-looking faces and costumes, and an endless number of things that you can distil into finely rendered forms. And what happens with regard to such walls and variegated stones is just as with the sound of bells, in whose peal you will find any name or word you care to imagine.

4. I say that when you are painting you ought to have by you a flat mirror in which you should often look at your work. The work will appear to you in reverse and will seem to be by the hand of another master and thereby you will better judge its faults.

5. How to learn well by heart: When you wish to be able to make use of something committed to memory adopt this method, which is that when you have drawn the same thing so many times that it seems you have it by heart try to do it without the exemplar. Have your exemplar traced on to a thin flat plane of glass. Place this on top of the drawing you have done without the exemplar, and note carefully where the tracing does not match up with your drawing, and in those places where you have made a mistake, resolve not to repeat the error. In fact, go back to the exemplar and draw over and over it the erroneous part till you have it firmly in your memory.

6. I say that in narrative paintings you should closely intermingle direct opposites, because they offer a great contrast to each other, and the more so the more they are adjacent. Thus, have the ugly one next to the beautiful, the large next to the small, the old next to the young, the strong next to the weak. In this way there is as much variety, as closely juxtaposed as possible.

7. It previously happened to me that I made a picture representing a holy subject, which was bought by someone who loved it and who wished to remove the attributes of its divinity in order that he might kiss it without guilt. But finally his conscience overcame his sighs and lust, and he was forced to banish it from his house.

8. And if you should have a love for such things you might be prevented by loathing, and if that did not prevent you, you might be deterred by the fear of living in the night hours in the company of those corpses, quartered and flayed and horrible to see. And if this did not prevent you, perhaps you might not be able to draw so well.

Do you know what you will achieve if you practice drawing with a pen? It will enable you, trained and skilful, to draw a great deal in your head.
Exert yourself and take delight in copying always the best things – crafted by the hand of great masters – that you can find.

Cenninno Cenninni, Libro d’Arte, 1400

In the doctor’s schools of anatomy he dissected the corpses of criminals, undismayed by the brutal and repulsive nature of this study and only eager to learn how to portray in his painting the various limbs and muscles, their bending and stretching, in accordance with the laws of nature.

Paolo Giovio, 1525

I would not like to neglect to repeat the words I heard King François I say about him: (…) he did not believe there could be anyone else on earth who knew as much as Leonardo, not just about sculpture, painting and architecture, but also insofar as he was a great philosopher.

Benvenuto Cellini, 1562

Altogether, his genius was so wonderfully inspired by the grace of God, his powers of expression were so powerfully fed by a willing memory and intellect, and his writing conveyed his ideas so precisely, that his arguments and reasonings confounded the most formidable critics.

Giorgio Vasari, 1568

During his apprenticeship, Leonardo sometimes made clay models, draping the figures with rags dipped in plaster, and then drawing them painstakingly on fine Rheims cloth or prepared linen. These drawings were done in black and white with the point of the brush, and the results were marvellous, as one can see from the examples I have in my book of drawings.

Giorgio Vasari, 1568

But before we go any further, we must say a little more about Leonardo’s personality and talents. The many gifts that Nature bestowed upon him concentrated themselves primarily in his eye. Hence, although capable of all things, he appeared great above all as a painter. He did not rely simply upon the inner impulses of his innate, inestimable talent; he permitted no arbitrary, random stroke of the brush; everything had to be deliberate and considered. From the pure proportions to which he devoted so much research, to the strangest monsters that he compiled out of contradictory figures, everything had to be both natural and rational.

Goethe, 1787

It requires a quite different strenght and agility to maintain one’s position within a system that is never fixed and where ideas are free and still evolving, than in a dogmatic world. Leonardo da Vinci stands higher than Michaelangelo, Michaelangelo higher than Rafael.

Nietzsche, 1885

Painting, for Leonardo, is an operation which calls for every sphere of knowledge and almost every technique. Geometry, dynamics, geology, physiology. Representing a battle requires a study of whirlpools and swirls of dust; he will only portray them having observed them with his own eyes, so that his attempt will be well researched and informed by an understanding of their laws.

Paul Valéry, 1895

Art and scientific genius came together in Leonardo’s spirit.

Thomas Mann, 1936

Tolerance, it is true, demands that we respect differences of belief. But as already recognized by Leonardo da Vinci, to the degree that the truth becomes better known, so general consensus will come to replace individual opinions.

Thomas Mann, 1945

______________

[1] Source: Leonardo da Vinci, The Complete Drawings by Johannes Nathan and Frank Zöllner, Taschen, Bibliotheca Universalis, 2023

True Machine Reasoning

Proper, scientific machine Learning.
Proper, scientific machine Reasoning.
The engineering Middle Ages ends today.

Arithmetic and Geometry offer the supreme certainty.

Leonardo da Vinci

The presentation, without the demonstration, can be downloaded here.
You can watch the video on Rumble here.

This model is based on the proper, scientific machine model of Learning which is described here.

February 2026 Update:

This model became the basis for a proper, scientific machine model of Cognition which is described here.

____________
Header image: citological drawing by Ramon y Cajal.