It requires a quite different strength and agility to maintain one’s position within a system that is never fixed and where ideas are free and still evolving, than in a dogmatic world.
Nietzsche, 1885
Nietzsche (1885) was talking about Leonardo da Vinci, but his words apply justly to the PMI Disciplined Agile system, a «people-first, learning-oriented, shared and ever-adapting body of knowledge». This system, in particular the DA Flow for Enterprise Transformation (DA FLEX), is the humane leadership approach we need to lead 21st century knowledge workers into a brighter future both for corporations and workers, breaking with decades of simplistic one-size-fits-all single-loop empirical control and people-alienating processes such as Scrum.
I have recently achieved the DA Value Stream Consultant certification, and I stand by every word that PMI uses to describe this wonderful body of knowledge. This is the way to build and lead great teams and re-energize enterprise-wide initiatives for the rest of the 21st century and beyond.
Also I would like to commend the PM Training School for their quality training and their support during the whole journey.
No college in the world can teach you how to achieve this result.
And it is easy to know for how long this status will last: as long as those “engineers” and computer “scientists” talk about probabilities and parameters, you will know that they are talking about something else entirely.
De forma a melhor gerir o potencial humano nas organizações, e no contexto do meu trabalho na área da gestão, desenvolvi um indicador fundamental para avaliar as capacidades reais de uma equipa, departamento ou empresa. Trata-se do Quociente Q/D.
Este indicador divide o grau de qualificações de uma pessoa pelo seu grau de doutrinação. Pretende-se que o resultado seja superior a 1, o que se traduz na capacidade útil do conhecimento ou seja de implementar transformações adaptativas para a organização através da mobilização construtiva do conhecimento existente. Um resultado inferior ou igual a 1 é um mau diagnóstico porque significa que a mobilização do conhecimento é não apenas motivada por, como destinada a, preservar uma doutrina.
Esta ferramenta essencial de diagnóstico permite explicar porque é que perfis que são bons no papel podem ser absolutamente desastrosos para a organização. Explica ainda porque é que a moderna academia está a prejudicar as organizações, ao promover a doutrinação dos estudantes pelo menos tanto quanto as suas qualificações. Esta doutrinação nem sequer é política, é cientifica, e resulta ultimamente na incapacidade das pessoas de mobilizar as suas competências para mais do que aplicar a «sua ciência», para CRIAR ciência ou seja desenvolver o corpo de conhecimento existente.
Uma das vantagens deste indicador é que é extremamente fácil e prático de medir. Por exemplo, se quando questionado acerca do motivo pelo qual um colaborador desenvolve a sua abordagem a um problema, este responde com um equivalente ao racional «Porque sim.» ou «Porque fulano disse que era para ser assim.», o Quociente Q/D é objetivamente inferior a 1. Outro exemplo é que tipicamente os colaboradores que defendem uma visão da organização por castas, em que os deveres e direitos das pessoas são determinados não por um contrato social ou legal mas por atributos ou qualificações pessoais socialmente adquiridas, estes colaboradores não podem por definição ter um Quociente QD favorável.
Experimente já este novo indicador na sua organização e veja por si os resultados!
A framework cannot explain anything more fundamental to it since that fundamental reality is the model’s assumption.
Therefore, the inductive replacement of a framework by something fundamental is unbound. Therefore, there is no possibility of ever achieving a complete understanding of reality.
This post presents intelligent design as a resonance on the crystalline structure of the universe and follows the context of a previous article on the subject.
The concept of resonance allows to understand the crystalline structure of the universe, on one hand, and the idea of intelligent design in the universe on the other.
Firstly it is necessary to clarify that we do not have any conscious experience of time whatsoever. We only perceive time by comparing different moments. In this sense, we exist in a single moment in time, the so called “here and now”. Which is the same as saying that this is the way by which everything is presented to us, hence the common saying that reality is the here and now. But it is asserted that that is not a portrait of reality but instead our perspective of reality.
Now if something exists independently from the perception of its existence, then it has to exist in time, that is, it cannot by itself cease to exist. Due to the fact that our perception is time-less, from the PoV of this perception this impossibility of the (future) inexistence of something is a retroactive consequence in time. That is, it is a consequence of something that is established after its perception.
This is where we gain the perception of intelligent design, that is, the consciousness of future states of which the current state is a cause.
In reality there is no design a priori but the perception of a design.
This can be defined, from the perspective of the perception of something, as a resonance in time, that is, a constructive interference in at least one dimension of the universe (in this case, time).
This applies to something that exists at any moment in time, therefore what exists at some point in time has always existed and always will exist. This demonstrates the crystalline structure of the universe, since there is nothing that is left to add to the universe. Everything that exists is a resonance in a crystalline structure, that is, a complete and immutable structure.
The perception of the universe adds to the dimensions by which it is perceived at least one other dimension, that of the subject of perception. The subject can perceive himself, therefore the universe is perceived as infinite-dimensional. therefore, either the universe is a-dimensional or it is infinite-dimensional. What here is said regarding time applies to the perception of the universe in any N dimensions relative to the (N+1)-th dimension.
Another way of looking at this is the fact that the number of possible configurations of any system increases exponentially with the number of its constituent parts. Therefore, more complex systems are more likely than otherwise (this likelihood spawns from the resonance mentioned before). The law of entropy still holds, but at a subsystem level. At a super-system level it is superseeded. This explains the order on the universe, and that the disorder is in reality an affirmation of the different (infinite though countable) possibilities of order.
All this does not mean that God does not exist but rather that, if it does, we are certainly a part of it. It is not an entity distinct from its creation. It is THE creation, both as an object and as an action.
Nothingness, since it cannot define itself, is a definition of the existence of something. This something is indeterminate, that is, this definition underlies everything that exists.
Therefore, defining nothingness is to create everything that exists. [1]
Meditation, as a form of defining nothingness, is a form of contemplating the creation, and a form of creation.
If it does not itself change reality, it allows to create a perception of reality.
From nothing… everything.
_______
[1] this is isomorphic to the concept of inversion dealt with on previous posts
Proof of the existence (1) and unicity (2) of the decomposition. As usual, the only thing relevant here is the music score, but you go ahead and spend 20 minutes dumbing yourself down like the good ideological peasant that you are. The trailer trash nobodies who profit from this will tell you its a “higher” form of education.
music: Mozart Concerto for Piano and Orchestra No. 20, I. Allegro and II. Romance (excerpt) Mitsuko Uchida; English Chamber Orchestra, Jeffrey Tate
Compliments of the Author 