Another logical argument in favour of the resonance on a universal crystalline structure can be provided as follows. This adds to the prior analysis available here.
Let A and B be two events in different moments in time.
If A implies B, that is if we have B whenever we have A, then B asserts the verification of A.
Therefore, A cannot have happened after B given that B happened.
Therefore, we say that A causes B.
But if A and B happen in different moments in time, which is an assumption for the causality relation, then when B happens A already happened.
Therefore, when B happens there is nothing happening that can cause B, which is a contradiction [1].
Therefore, if B happened then some information regarding A was propagated in a fractional time between A and B happening.
And this propagation has to happen in a medium or dimension that is foreign to time, otherwise the causality A => B would be restrict to time leading to the contradiction [1].
This is the same concept as that of the resonance that I have already explored before, that is, A causes B as much as B causes A, and the medium in which the causality takes effect, a medium foreign to time, can only be a subset of the crystalline structure of the Universe, since it is time invariant.
Equivalently, causality and retroactivity are two aspects of the same mechanism, which we refer to by the concept of “resonance” on a necessarily time-invariant medium.
As stated elsewhere, this explains why events in the Universe follow a given path while not leaving the evidences of all the trial of possibilities that should be the case had a (time-dependent) causality (but not a resonance) taken place.
For example, biological systems developed light capturing devices (the eyes) because there is visible light, but equivalently visible light exists because something is affected by it. Both are evidences of the same mechanism, action or property. And there is no evidence that biological systems had developed sensing to the entire range of light spectrum which had been selectively “pruned” by natural selection to just a specific range of frequencies. Therefore, the “choice” of the method for sensing light was the same “choice” for the existence of light. Here we say “choice” to mean a time-invariant mechanism, or the concept of a “resonance” on a time-invariant medium.
This explains why species evolved in a specific way while we could never find all the intermediate fossil forms and wide-raging branches that evolution should have produced if Darwin’s assumptions were true.
The same for the number of arms or legs, for the symmetry of biological systems, for the arrangement of electrons in atoms and so on.
Everything that exists or happens is therefore a manifestation of the same crystalline, immutable universal geometry. And the interesting thing about it is that it should be possible to infer the properties of such a structure by its manifestations.
This is, again, consistent with non-dual postulates such as
- What you seek is seeking you
- You already are what you will become
Moreover, the parallel universes theory of physics is an application of these principles, since the possibilities for the state of a system spread throughout the parallel dimensions, the collection of those becoming the universal geometric structure.
Compliments of the Author 